BioCells MedicalBioCells Medical
Request Consultation
BioCells MedicalBioCells Medical

European private clinic specialising in personalised regenerative and stem cell therapy. Warsaw, Poland. Since 2013.

info@biocellsmedical.com

Treatment Programs

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
  • Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
  • Parkinson’s Disease
  • Multiple System Atrophy (MSA)
  • Peripheral Neuropathy
  • Muscular Dystrophy
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
  • Cerebral Palsy
  • All Diagnoses →

About

  • Medical Team
  • Philosophy
  • Clinical Data
  • FAQ

Contact

+48 22 307 48 82(EN/RU/PL)

+39 392 995 41 31(IT)

+33 4 23 11 00 21(FR)

Locations

By appointment only

Franciszka Klimczaka 8A, 02-797 Warsaw, Poland

Research center

75 Kneeland Street, 14th Floor, Boston MA 02111, USA

© 2013–2026 BIOCELLS MEDICAL Sp. z o.o. | KRS: 0001099454 | NIP: 1133130802

Privacy PolicyCookie PolicyChild Protection Policy
  1. Home
  2. /Research & Publications

Research & Publications

Clinical Research Registry

Active contribution to global research in regenerative medicine — from officially registered clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov to peer-reviewed scientific context. As both sponsor and clinical site, BioCells Medical participates in international registries with full transparency, systematically collecting real-world data on advanced cellular and exosome-based therapies.

Sponsor & Clinical Site: BioCells Medical · Warsaw, Poland · ClinicalTrials.gov

Observational RegistryNCT07143656Registered · Active

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Registry

Study Design

Retrospective · Observational · Registry

Enrollment

Not disclosed

Population

Patients with ALS

Sponsor

BioCells Medical · Warsaw, Poland

Background

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative condition that destroys motor neurons responsible for voluntary movement — leading to muscle weakness, loss of speech and swallowing, respiratory decline, and ultimately profound physical dependence. Despite decades of intensive research, there remains no curative treatment, and the mechanisms driving disease variability across patients are incompletely understood.

Study Purpose

This retrospective observational registry is designed to systematically compile and analyse existing clinical data from patients with ALS treated at BioCells Medical. Rather than testing a new intervention, the study examines how disease evolves over time, what functional trajectories are observed, and how different patient profiles correlate with clinical outcomes.

Study Population

  • •Patients with confirmed ALS diagnosis
  • •Retrospective data from existing medical records
  • •No healthy volunteers — patient cohort only
  • •Multicenter design for data breadth

Key Outcome Focus Areas

  • •Natural history and disease progression patterns
  • •Functional changes over follow-up periods
  • •Clinical and demographic correlates of outcomes
  • •Baseline characteristics and longitudinal stability markers

Scientific Significance

ALS observational registries provide the clinical community with critical epidemiological and longitudinal data that inform therapeutic trial design, patient stratification, and outcome benchmarking. NCT07143656 contributes to this global evidence base by documenting real-world clinical trajectories at a specialised European regenerative medicine centre, helping contextualise functional observations within the broader natural history of the disease.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov↗
Prospective Observational StudyNCT07145502Registered · Active

Monitoring of Outcomes of Cellular and Exosome-based Therapies in Autoinflammatory and Post-infectious Neuroinflammatory Syndromes

Study Design

Prospective · Non-randomised · Observational Registry

Enrollment

76 patients

Population

Ages 6–70 · Neuroinflammatory syndromes

Sponsor

BioCells Medical · Warsaw, Poland

Background

Neuroinflammatory conditions — encompassing autoimmune encephalitis, post-infectious encephalopathies, and neuroinflammatory demyelination — represent a complex group of central nervous system disorders that can cause profound cognitive impairment, neurological deficits, fatigue, and reduced quality of life. In many patients, standard immunomodulatory therapies provide incomplete or only transient relief, underscoring an urgent clinical need for deeper understanding of alternative supportive approaches.

Study Purpose

This prospective observational registry systematically monitors clinical outcomes in patients with autoimmune or post-infectious neuroinflammatory syndromes who receive individualised regenerative medicine protocols at BioCells Medical. The study captures neurological function, inflammatory biomarkers, and patient-reported quality of life over an 8-week observation window, generating structured real-world evidence for advanced cellular and exosome-based therapeutic approaches.

Study Population

  • •Autoimmune encephalitis
  • •Early-stage panencephalitis
  • •Neuroinflammatory demyelination
  • •Post-infectious neuroinflammatory syndromes
  • •Confirmed by neurologist or immunologist
  • •Insufficient response to conventional therapies

Key Outcome Focus Areas

  • •Primary: NIHSS — neurological symptom severity at baseline vs. 8 weeks
  • •Serum inflammatory biomarkers (IL-6, TNF-α)
  • •Quality of life: EQ-5D and SF-36 validated instruments
  • •Correlation of neurological changes with immunological markers

Interventions Observed

  • •Allogeneic MSC infusions (intravenous)
  • •MSC-derived exosomes (intravenous or intranasal)
  • •Optional T-regulatory cell therapy (compassionate-use basis, selected cases)

Scientific Significance

Observational studies of this design play a critical role in generating hypothesis-forming evidence for emerging therapeutic modalities. NCT07145502 contributes structured prospective data on how cellular and exosome-based interventions perform in a heterogeneous neuroinflammatory population — data that is currently scarce in the global literature. The inclusion of paediatric, adult, and older adult participants (ages 6–70) adds important breadth to the evidence base.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov↗
Interventional Clinical StudyNCT07146087Registered · Active

Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosome Therapy for Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Study Design

Interventional · Non-randomised · Single-arm

Enrollment

Adult participants (18+)

Population

Progressive MS (SPMS / PPMS)

Sponsor

BioCells Medical · Warsaw, Poland

Background

Multiple sclerosis, in its progressive forms — secondary progressive (SPMS) and primary progressive (PPMS) — represents one of the most therapeutically challenging phenotypes in neurology. Despite significant advances in immunomodulatory treatments for relapsing MS, effective interventions capable of meaningfully slowing the accumulation of disability in progressive disease remain a profound unmet medical need affecting millions of patients worldwide.

Study Purpose

This interventional study investigates whether intravenous infusions of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived exosomes can influence the clinical course of progressive MS. Unlike whole-cell therapies, exosomes are nanoscale extracellular vesicles produced by MSCs that carry proteins, lipids, and microRNAs involved in immunomodulation, intercellular communication, and neuroprotection — offering potential therapeutic activity without the complexities associated with live cell administration.

Study Design & Intervention

  • •Adults aged 18+ with confirmed progressive MS
  • •Intravenous infusions of allogeneic MSC-derived exosomes
  • •Structured clinical framework with safety monitoring
  • •Assessed at baseline and multiple post-infusion timepoints

Primary & Secondary Endpoints

  • •Primary: clinical disability and progression markers post-infusion
  • •Validated neurological scoring (disability scales for MS)
  • •Safety profile: adverse events monitoring post-infusion
  • •Immune and inflammatory biomarker evaluation
  • •Exploratory: mobility, cognition, daily activity function

Proposed Mechanisms of Action

  • •Delivery of regulatory microRNAs influencing neuroinflammation
  • •Paracrine immunomodulatory signals modulating aberrant immune responses
  • •Support for neural tissue homeostasis via bioactive molecular cargo
  • •Potential neuroprotective activity in regions of progressive neurodegeneration

Scientific Significance

MSC-derived exosome therapy represents one of the most scientifically promising frontiers in regenerative neurology. By delivering regulatory biological signals — including anti-inflammatory microRNAs and neuroprotective proteins — without the logistical and regulatory complexity of live-cell products, exosomes offer a potentially scalable and reproducible biological platform. NCT07146087 positions BioCells Medical at the forefront of translational research in this emerging field, contributing the first structured clinical data from a European setting on exosome therapy specifically in progressive MS.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov↗
Editorial

Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT) vs Compassionate Use: Key Differences in Modern Medicine

Dr. Uladzislau Tsvirko · BioCells Medical

Overview

In modern medical discourse — particularly in the context of advanced, regenerative, and cell-based therapies — two fundamentally different clinical frameworks are frequently conflated by patients, families, and even non-specialist clinicians: randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and compassionate use. Although both play important roles in the development and application of medical innovation, they serve distinct scientific, ethical, and regulatory purposes.

Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT)

Randomized controlled trials represent the gold standard of clinical evidence generation. In a classic RCT design, participants are randomly assigned to receive either the investigational treatment or a control (which may be a placebo, standard of care, or another comparator), with neither participants nor clinicians knowing the allocation (double-blinding). This methodology minimises selection bias and confounding, producing the highest level of causal evidence for treatment efficacy. RCTs are conducted under strict regulatory oversight, require Institutional Review Board or Ethics Committee approval, must be pre-registered in recognised clinical trial registries, and typically enrol large, highly selected patient populations against tightly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Compassionate Use

Compassionate use — also known as expanded access or named-patient programmes — refers to the provision of investigational or unapproved treatments outside the context of a formal clinical trial, to individual patients with serious or life-threatening conditions who have exhausted standard therapeutic options. It is a regulatory and ethical mechanism designed to provide access to potentially beneficial treatments in situations of urgent medical need. Compassionate use is authorised by national competent authorities on a case-by-case basis and does not require the same level of controlled study design as a formal trial. However, it does require documented medical justification, informed patient consent, and appropriate safety monitoring.

Key Distinctions

DimensionRCTCompassionate Use
PurposeGenerate controlled efficacy and safety evidenceProvide access to treatment outside trial context
DesignRandomised, controlled, blindedIndividualised, uncontrolled, observational
Patient selectionStrict inclusion/exclusion criteriaCase-by-case medical justification
Evidence levelHighest (causal inference)Anecdotal / observational
Regulatory basisFull regulatory framework (IND/CTA)National authority authorisation (case-by-case)
PublicationPeer-reviewed trial resultsCase reports, registries, compassionate-use data
BioCells Medical roleSponsor & clinical site — NCT registrationsIndividualised patient programmes — physician oversight

Key Distinctions

Purpose

RCT: Generate controlled efficacy and safety evidence

Compassionate Use: Provide access to treatment outside trial context

Design

RCT: Randomised, controlled, blinded

Compassionate Use: Individualised, uncontrolled, observational

Patient selection

RCT: Strict inclusion/exclusion criteria

Compassionate Use: Case-by-case medical justification

Evidence level

RCT: Highest (causal inference)

Compassionate Use: Anecdotal / observational

Regulatory basis

RCT: Full regulatory framework (IND/CTA)

Compassionate Use: National authority authorisation (case-by-case)

Publication

RCT: Peer-reviewed trial results

Compassionate Use: Case reports, registries, compassionate-use data

BioCells Medical role

RCT: Sponsor & clinical site — NCT registrations

Compassionate Use: Individualised patient programmes — physician oversight

BioCells Medical’s Position

BioCells Medical operates across both dimensions of this framework with scientific rigour and transparency. As the sponsor and clinical site of three officially registered studies on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07143656, NCT07145502, NCT07146087), the clinic actively contributes structured, registry-grade data to the global scientific community — documenting real-world outcomes of regenerative medicine interventions under systematic research protocols. In parallel, and in accordance with applicable European medical regulations, BioCells Medical also provides individualised regenerative medicine programmes to patients with serious neurological and autoimmune conditions who have not responded adequately to conventional care. These programmes are designed by a physician-led medical team, subject to ongoing clinical monitoring, and conducted with full informed patient consent — consistent with the ethical principles of compassionate-use frameworks.

For Referring Physicians

Discuss a Patient Case or Request Study Data

Our medical team is available for physician-to-physician consultations. We can provide detailed study protocols, discuss eligibility criteria, or review a patient case. All communications are confidential.

Request Consultationinfo@biocellsmedical.com